http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Very-slow-opening-of-stacks-in-Fiji-tp5010010p5010024.html
a little correction: It looks like only the stacks from one manufacturer have problems with slice order. It is the brand I use most in my research, so I had the impression that the problem is more common. Still they open correctly with Scifio.
Gerald R. Torgersen
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ImageJ Interest Group [mailto:
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
>Gerald Ruiner Torgersen
>Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 3:27 PM
>To:
[hidden email]
>Subject: Re: Very slow opening of stacks in Fiji
>
>Thank you Mark,
>
>I have enabled them manually because of the better support of DICOM i IJ2.
>But the files I am working with recently are not compressed, så IJ1 opens
>them.
>With SCIFIO disabled Fiji is as quick as ImageJ. The problem is that DICOM
>stacks get sorted the wrong way in original ImageJ. This works right in SCIFIO.
>Looking forward to see the release with all issues fixed :-)
>
>Greetings
>Gerald R. Torgersen
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: ImageJ Interest Group [mailto:
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
>>Mark Hiner
>>Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 3:20 PM
>>To:
[hidden email]
>>Subject: Re: Very slow opening of stacks in Fiji
>>
>>Hi Gerald,
>>
>> Yes, there are several known performance issues in the ImageJ2
>>components, many of which are still in beta and unoptimized. For
>>typical users, all options under "Edit > Options > ImageJ2" should be
>>disabled while we work to move these products towards a release state.
>>These options should have been disabled by default; please let us know if
>they were not.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Mark
>>
>>On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Gerald Ruiner Torgersen <
>>
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear List members:
>>>
>>> I am using Fiji with the latest updates (ImageJ2 components). I work
>>> a lot with stacks (DICOM files, mostly 1k*1k resolution, 16 bit, 150
>>> -
>>> 800 slices/images).
>>> I open them dragging the folder containing the files and dropping
>>> them on the Fiji window. It takes now very long time (minutes) to
>>> open such a slice vs seconds in ImageJ (original). It has been like
>>> that for a while. I think it has something to do with the ImageJ2
>components?
>>>
>>> Mvh
>>> Gerald R. Torgersen
>>> IT-seksjonen,
>>> Det odontologiske fakultet / Faculty of Dentistry Universitetet i
>>> Oslo / University of Oslo
>>>
>>> --
>>> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>>>
>>
>>--
>>ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>
>--
>ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html