How does Multiview-Reconstruction compare to Zeiss?

Posted by Mario Emmenlauer-3 on Nov 04, 2014; 7:57am
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/How-does-Multiview-Reconstruction-compare-to-Zeiss-tp5010290.html

Dear All,

I'm trying to automate the workflow from a Zeiss Lightsheet Z.1 to
the registered/fused/deconvolved volume. Previously we used the Zeiss
software, but I understand that this can not easily be scripted and/or
distributed on a cluster?

What is the best replacement that is scriptable and cluster-runnable?
I've found http://fiji.sc/Multiview-Reconstruction (MR) and it looks
very promising, but how does it exactly compare to the Zeiss software?
I understand Zeiss does not require beads, MR does? And our workflow
uses DualSide Fusion, is that supported with MR? Finally, how do they
compare in terms of quality of the result, is one or the other software
"better" in any aspect by a reasonable margin, or do they compare on
par?

Thanks for feedback, and all the best,

   Mario




--
Mario Emmenlauer BioDataAnalysis             Mobil: [phone]
Balanstrasse 43                    mailto: mario.emmenlauer * unibas.ch
D-81669 München                          http://www.biodataanalysis.de/

--
ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html