http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/creating-a-real-blank-image-tp5010383p5010458.html
impression. However, the footnote regarding ImagJ1 is less clear but it
> Hi Herbie,
>
>> I need to know whether plain ImageJ2 (not Fiji with its additional
>> plugins) is open source in exactly the same legal sense as plain
>> ImageJ1?
>
> Like most of the SciJava software projects [1], ImageJ2 uses the Simplified
> BSD License [2], one of the most popular permissive OSS licenses. It makes
> only one stipulation: that derivative works retain the copyright notice,
> for purposes of provenance tracking and citation.
>
> We have been very careful to track the origin of all source code in the
> projects, including dependencies, to ensure that all stated licenses are
> indeed valid.
>
> The following newly minted wiki page summarizes everything, including a
> discussion of ImageJ 1.x's copyright status:
>
> *
http://imagej.net/Licensing>
> These pages may be informative as well:
>
> *
http://choosealicense.com/> *
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_work_by_the_U.S._government>
> Regards,
> Curtis
>
> [1]
http://imagej.net/SciJava> [2]
http://imagej.net/BSD>
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Herbie <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Dear Curtis and those who are in the know,
>>
>> for good reasons I need to know whether plain ImageJ2 (not Fiji with its
>> additional plugins) is open source in exactly the same legal sense as plain
>> ImageJ1?
>>
>> With "plain ImageJ2" I mean the software that provides about the same
>> functionality as ImageJ1.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Herbie
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
>>
>> --
>> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>>
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>