http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Touching-particle-accurate-counting-tp5011214p5011221.html
particles. Or do you need the exact measurements of every single particle?
> Hey! Thanks for answering.
>
> This is a backscattered image, but this SEM seems to add a little SE
> detection, which indeed add shadows in the image (I will use another SEM or
> change some parameters next time). I normally have .tif images but it seems
> that this website does not accept them, so I had to convert them in .png.
>
> Here is are two other .jpg images with no shadows (and no white particles
> as
> you called them), I still have a lot of difficulties to process them
> properly... Having a global idea of the number of diamonds is all right,
> but
> if i want to have 1% accuracy or so it's another problem.
>
> I added the processed images to illustrate the problem: some particles are
> split with watersheding and become too small, whereas some others are not
> cut and are too big. Is there a way to fix that?
> Image 1 <
http://i.imgur.com/IkOeq0C.jpg>
> image 1 processed <
http://i.imgur.com/2MEaKvm.jpg>
> image 2 <
http://i.imgur.com/HQFwcL0.jpg>
> image 2 processed <
http://i.imgur.com/KHcwR3O.jpg>
>
> What really annoys me is that the human eye perfectly count the diamonds,
> but that it becomes incredibly more difficult to do it with a computer :(
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
>
http://imagej.1557.x6.nabble.com/Touching-particle-accurate-counting-tp5011214p5011218.html> Sent from the ImageJ mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>