Posted by
Krs5 on
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Weird-macro-behaviour-tp5011475p5011490.html
Dear Anália,
I don't seem to be able to reproduce your problem. It does not matter if I run your macro via the editor or via Macros > Run or Macros > Install, the result is a saved merged file. The only thing I changed in your macro is the path the files are stored and saved to.
Kees
-----Original Message-----
From: ImageJ Interest Group [mailto:
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of analia
Sent: 06 February 2015 16:03
To:
[hidden email]
Subject: Re: Weird macro behaviour
Dear Gabriel,
unfortunately neither options worked :-(
I have created a small test macro
<
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3yFlb9_8aVZQ1JQZmI0NXBqdG8/view?usp=sharing>
to help you reproduce my problem, along with some data.
51_FA_65_5.tif (green)-1 is the input image and 51_FA_65_5.tif is the original image.
The image 51_FA_65_5.tif (green)-1 results from previous processing of 51_FA_65_5.tif, so that I could simplify the code and focus on the issue.
Now, if I open the 51_FA_65_5.tif (green)-1 in ImageJ and write down the code in the macro editor (ImageJ->Plugins->New) and run it from that window (Macros->Run Macro) I get the roi.tif (as supposed to).
If I try to run the macro ImageJ->Plugins->Macros->Run, I don't get any error but the roi.tif is not created.
And if I comment the Add Image command I do get the file created (although not with the desired contents, of course).
Thanks,
Anália
--
View this message in context:
http://imagej.1557.x6.nabble.com/Weird-macro-behaviour-tp5011475p5011486.htmlSent from the ImageJ mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html--
ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html