http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Get-the-number-of-frames-from-a-multiple-tiff-header-tp5012283p5012417.html
> Thanks your very much for your answers.
>
> For a tiff file containing 4086 slices (frames) which corresponds to a 2Go
> file, it takes:
>
> *2 minutes and 30 seconds *on a computer: Intel Xeon E5-1620 @3.6GHz + RAM
> 8Go
> and
> *22 secondes *on a second computer: Intel Xeon E5-2630 @2.3GHz + RAM 16Go
> *16 secondes *on a second computer: Intel Core I7-4770 @3.4GHz + RAM 16Go
>
> I don't understand why we should read all the headers just to know the
> number of slices.
> This should be in the ideal world instantaneous as it is to know the image
> size.
>
> Why theheader is not designed to contain the number of slices directly?!!!
>
> Thanks in advance for your precious comments.
>
> Best regards.
> Sébastien
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://imagej.1557.x6.nabble.com/Get-the-number-of-frames-from-a-multiple-tiff-header-tp5012283p5012322.html> Sent from the ImageJ mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>
>