http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Fields-of-Generic-Dialog-out-of-the-gd-window-tp5012904p5012918.html
Thank you for your quick and advised replies.
to create two gd because this is the easiest way for me at short term. It
also makes me want to have a look on IJ2 in the future...
BR.
> Hi Philippe,
>
> you can use addCheckboxGroup for checkboxes.
>
> For other fields, you can only use addPanel(), but then you have to care
> about all the listeners yourself, and it does not work with macros or
> IJ.run() commands (neither macro recording nor automatic decoding macro
> options).
>
> I must admit that something like a GenericDialog.stayOnLine() command is
> also on my wishlist for quite a while, typically for combining numbers and
> booleans (e.g. fixing a fit parameter for custom curve fitting code, or
> enabling/disabling a feature).
> The reason why I did not propose it yet was that I am not sure how to do
> it such that
> (1) the UI looks nice when combining different field types (numbers,
> texts, checkboxes),
> (2) and repeating field names are not a problem (e.g. if many checkboxes
> are named 'fixed', they would have to be numbered for macros fix_01, fix_02
> or so).
>
>
> Michael
> ________________________________________________________________
> On May 21, 2015, at 20:28, Philippe GENDRE wrote:
>
> > Dear List,
> >
> > If a Generic Dialog window has too much fields, some of them cannot be
> > reached because they are not displayed on the screen.
> >
> > Is there a way to adjust the fields size of a gd to the window size or to
> > arrange the different fields on several columns ?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Philippe GENDRE
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>