Re: ridge detection

Posted by jumpfunky on Dec 17, 2015; 1:47pm
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/ridge-detection-tp5015200p5015247.html

Dear Sho,

> 1) I'd like to know the total length of a ridge, not just of each
> segments.

If you have SLOPE overlap resolution activated, it will try to merge
the segments to complete ridges. However, at the moment the slope
resolution is a little bit buggy:
https://github.com/thorstenwagner/ij-ridgedetection/issues

> 2) I'd like to be able to call upon the results data of "Contours"
> window and save them as a variable in a macro. I can't use getResult
> function because the table isn't a Results window.

In 1.1.7 it is a Results window:
https://github.com/thorstenwagner/ij-ridgedetection/releases/tag/v1.1.7

Please update via biomedgroup update site.

Cheers,
Thorsten

> Thank you in advance. 
>
> Sho Fujisawa
> Molecular Cytology Core Facility
> Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
> 415 E. 68th St. Z-1840
> New York, NY 10065
> [phone]
> ________________________________________
> From: ImageJ Interest Group [[hidden email]] on behalf of
> Thorsten Wagner [[hidden email]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 5:37 AM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: ridge detection
>
> Dear Fabrice,
>
> thanks for reporting! Fixed in the latest release. Just update via
> biomedgroup update site or download it here:
> https://github.com/thorstenwagner/ij-ridgedetection/releases/tag/v1.1
> .4
>
> Cheers,
> Thorsten
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 10.12.2015, 11:16 +0100 schrieb Fabrice Senger:
> > Dear all while this is probably a more specific question to
> > thorsten
> > wagner, does anybody now what is the problem when the plugin tells
> > you :
> >
> > " Ah, zwei hauptlinien, das geht nicht ..."
> >
> > Wich basically means that you can not get two principal lines by
> > means of
> > the plugin, while if you ignore this statement by pressing OK the
> > calculation goes on and you get the expected result.
> >
> > I'm using this approach for the analysis of actin stress fibers and
> > it
> > gives good results, but this message is quite a problem
> > particularly
> > if you
> > want to integrate the analysis into a batch process.
> >
> > Thank you for any comment on this,
> >
> > Fabrice.
> >
> > --
> > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html
>
> =====================================================================
>
>      Please note that this e-mail and any files transmitted from
>      Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center may be privileged,
> confidential,
>      and protected from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader of
>      this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or
> agent
>      responsible for delivering this message to the intended
> recipient,
>      you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination,
> distribution,
>      copying, or other use of this communication or any of its
> attachments
>      is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication
> in
>      error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this
> message
>      and deleting this message, any attachments, and all copies and
> backups
>      from your computer.
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html

--
ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html