Re: Change in log calculation behavior

Posted by Rasband, Wayne (NIH/NIMH) [E] on Apr 28, 2016; 6:03pm
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Re-Change-in-log-calculation-behavior-tp5016262p5016268.html

> On Apr 27, 2016, at 8:21 PM, Greg Reneff <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Take 2 because take one was rejected for zip file attachment.
>
> On 4/27/16, Greg Reneff <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> I'm getting different results when I run the attached script against
>> the attached image between two different versions of ImageJ
>>
>> version 1.50b gives me an image as I might expect
>> version 1.50i gives me an image with only two values in it.  Almost
>> like it's been thresholded.

The latest ImageJ daily build (1.51a16) fixes a 1.50d regression that caused the Process>Math>Macro command to not work as expected with signed 16-bit images.

-wayne

--
ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html