Re: Stitching output has missing pixels

Posted by Aryeh Weiss on Dec 08, 2016; 8:41pm
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Stitching-output-has-missing-pixels-tp5017714p5017727.html

I think that there is always a problem with placement of the first tile,
but only  when the error grows large enough does it not get place in the
fusion. This is only a guess.

This is the reason I did an entire series of sizes -- to see it develop.

Best regards
--aryeh

On 08/12/2016 21:56, MChapman wrote:

> Aryeh,
>
> It is interesting that the error only shows up when there are more than 90
> tiles because I have seen the error flag in the Log as it being a poor
> alignment of the first two tiles.
>
> I also do not understand why it would throw out the first tile if it is a
> bad match...shouldn't the first tile be the reference and if it was a bad
> match between the first two that it would disregard the second tile?
>
> I think the bug lies in that part of the program.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://imagej.1557.x6.nabble.com/Stitching-output-has-missing-pixels-tp5017714p5017725.html
> Sent from the ImageJ mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html
>

--
Aryeh Weiss
Faculty of Engineering
Bar Ilan University
Ramat Gan 52900 Israel

Ph:  972-3-5317638
FAX: [phone]

--
ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html