http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Any-suggestions-for-the-estimate-of-domain-size-tp5019401p5019404.html
part contains the small ones. For the covenience, I am attaching the
small domains. I hope now it helps to understand what I want to measure.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Straub, Volko A. (Dr.) <
> Hi Anu,
>
> I think it would be useful, if you could annotate the image to indicate
> what you mean by 'the size of the domains (both big and small).' This is a
> rather complex image and I am uncertain what you are trying to measure. You
> also mention a hole inside the large domain. Again, this seems rather vague
> as it is not clear to me what constitutes a 'large domain'. Perhaps you
> might get some more useful suggestions if you can actually define the
> problem more precisely.
>
> Good luck,
>
> Volko
>
> ________________________________
> From: ImageJ Interest Group <
[hidden email]> on behalf of anusuya
> pal <
[hidden email]>
> Sent: 19 September 2017 22:12:45
> To:
[hidden email]
> Subject: Any suggestions for the estimate of domain size?
>
> Hello,
>
> I have an image to analyze, and it is very hard to differentiate/segment. I
> have already tried all the basic segmentations (Trainable Weka
> Segmentation, Morphological Segmentation, water shedding with BIovoxxel
> tool etc) but it didn't work. I need only the information about the size of
> the domains (both big and small). For the convenience, here is the image
> attached(already converted into 8 bit).
>
> May I seek your suggestions so that I can estimate the size of the domains,
> without the concern of the hole present inside of the large domain?
>
> I already had this post before but there was a problem of openinf the
> image, and so, I posted again with the corrected file format.
>
> Thanks
> Anu
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>