http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Extended-Particle-Analyzer-Different-results-on-PC-and-Mac-tp5019990p5020021.html
I tested your macro and it works as intended and gives me 507 particles. If
the background definition is changed it leads to 0 results. So, currently I
> Dear Volko,
>
> Can you provide the complete macro?
> My guess would be the black background definition (except the correct
> particles are selected by the ROIs) or as Aryeh already stated any of the
> other parameters. I personally cannot test it on a mac but have not seen
> this behaviour before.
>
> Regards,
> Jan
>
>
> 2018-02-05 15:42 GMT+01:00 Straub, Volko A. (Dr.) <
[hidden email]>:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I have observed some unexpected behaviour using the Extended Particle
>> Analyzer in a macro.
>> I have analysed the attached image using the Extended Particle Analyzer
>> as part of a macro with the following command:
>>
>> min=20;
>> max=300;
>> run("Extended Particle Analyzer", "area="+min+"-"+max+" pixel
>> roundness=0.4-1.00 show=Nothing redirect=None keep=None add reset");
>>
>> This generates a list of 507 ROIs in the ROI manager.
>>
>> However, when I gave the macro to a student for some analysis, who is
>> using a Mac laptop, using the same command on the same image only found 287
>> ROIs. Manual inspection of the ROI table showed that many of the larger
>> particles were missed.
>> I am stumped and have no idea why the same macro command applied to the
>> same image should produce such different results just because the macro is
>> executed on a different operating system.
>>
>> Is this a bug? Any ideas what might be going on?
>> Thanks,
>> Volko
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> CEO: Dr. Jan Brocher
> phone: +49 (0)176 705 746 81 <+49%20176%2070574681>
> e-mail:
[hidden email]
> info:
[hidden email]
> inquiries:
[hidden email]
> web: www.biovoxxel.de
>
CEO: Dr. Jan Brocher