http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Log-Math-Function-tp5020510p5020517.html
ones. The documentation says there is no scaling for 32-bit images, so
base e.
>
> On 4/17/18, 4:52 PM, "Jacob Keller" <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I copied and pasted the documentation as found at
>
https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/docs/menus/process.html#math, and it does
> not
> specify natural log??? Is there another place for documentation? Again,
> here it is:
>
> Log...For 8-bit images, applies the function *f(p) = log(p) *
> 255/log(255)* to
> each pixel (*p*) in the image or selection. For RGB images, this
> function
> is applied to all three color channels. For 16-bit images, the image
> min
> and max are used for scaling instead of 255. For float images, no
> scaling
> is done. To calculate log10 of the image, multiply the result of this
> operation by 0.4343 (1/log(10).
>
>
> After a bit of searching, I found this page:
>
http://imagej.net/docs/guide/146-29.html#toc-Subsection-29.9 where it
> seems
> to have been improved:
>
>
> 29.9.12 Log
> For 8-bit images, applies the function *f*(*p*) = ln(*p*) × 255 ⁄
> ln(255) to
> each pixel (*p*) in the image or selection. For RGB images, this
> function
> is applied to all three color channels. For 16-bit images, the image
> min
> and max are used for scaling instead of 255. For float images, no
> scaling
> is done. To calculate log10 of the image, multiply the result of this
> operation by 0.4343 (1 ⁄ ln(10)).
>
>
> Anyway, perhaps, as you imply, the term "log" could be changed in
> future
> process>math> menus to "ln?" It certainly would have helped avoid my
> confusion. Who knows, there may be some scientific mistakes out there
> due
> to this notation issue.
>
> JPK
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Gabriel Landini <
[hidden email]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, 17 April 2018 20:55:48 BST
[hidden email] wrote:
> > > By deductive reasoning from the documentation, the answer is that
> "log"
> > in
> > > imagej means base 2.
> >
> > No, the documentation specifies "ln", i.e. in base e.
> > And it works fine and the conversion recipe to log10 is correct too.
> >
> > Perhaps you are getting confused because the command is listed in
> the menu
> > as
> > "Log".
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Gabriel
> >
> > --
> > ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html> >
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>
>
> ---
>
> The information in this email, including attachments, may be confidential
> and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you believe you received
> this email by mistake, please notify the sender by return email as soon as
> possible.
>
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>