Posted by
Kenneth Sloan-2 on
Oct 16, 2018; 12:23am
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/web-based-interface-tp5021314p5021318.html
At first glance, this is much more than I need. I don't need an API - just user-level interaction. I would
install all custom plugins on the server - the issue (I think) is fast-enough user interaction. For most of my
stuff, speed of rendering images is probably not crucial.
X11 - wow...a blast from the past. I thought X11 was dead and buried. If it's still viable, that might
be just what I need.
Anyone with *current* experience with this idea?
--
Kenneth Sloan
[hidden email]
Vision is the art of seeing what is invisible to others.
> On 15 Oct 2018, at 17:52 , Curtis Rueden <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi Kenneth,
>
> Check out
https://github.com/imagej/imagej-server.
>
> Regards,
> Curtis
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018, 17:46 Kenneth Sloan <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> What is the best way (IS THERE A WAY?) to provide remote access to ImageJ?
>>
>> Assume a working ImageJ setup in which the local file system has access to
>> all necessary input/output files. All I need to do is to provide remote
>> access.
>>
>> Either the central server or the remote access machines can be either
>> Mac or Windows. (that is, I'd prefer a solution that is mix&match, but
>> can probably use a solution that is either all Mac or all Windows.)
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kenneth Sloan
>>
[hidden email]
>> Vision is the art of seeing what is invisible to others.
>>
>> --
>> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>>
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html--
ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html