Re: 3D projections

Posted by Herbie on Mar 31, 2020; 10:37am
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/3D-projections-tp5023114p5023118.html

"ImageJ does not treat PIXELS as infinitely small in x and y [...]"

If you would, which were correct, you wouldn't see anything.
Therefore and in general, the cheapest interpolation is applied:
Little squares or rectangles of constant value(s).
Actually, such block images are incorrect as well, because the correct
interpolation is a totally different one that is much more costly and
cannot be realized by common display technology.

Regards

Herbie

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Am 30.03.20 um 23:49 schrieb Kenneth Sloan:

> This has always confused me.  After all, ImageJ does not treat PIXELS as infinitely small in x and y - so why should it consider  VOXELS to be infinitely thin in z (but with finite  width and height)?
>
> --
> Kenneth Sloan
> [hidden email]
> Vision is the art of seeing what is invisible to others.
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html
>

--
ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html