http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Is-imaging-technology-advanced-enough-to-do-this-tp5024265p5024266.html
then it is Alphabet/Google. However, I'm pretty sure that you wouldn't
Am 02.12.20 um 19:14 schrieb Jorge A. Santiago-Blay:
> Dear ImageJ members:
>
>
> Is technology advanced enough now to do what I describe in the next few
> lines? Given that Google Maps stores the data and images captured from the
> roads, is there a way to automatically combine artificial intelligence
> software to id the obvious objects (e.g., plants) all over the planet and
> whenever one is detected, dump the image into a folder of images along with
> the all-important lat, long, and the date? Once the software learns that
> such and such shape is whatever is of interest to us, it can
> *automatically* keep identifying the object and dumping images with the
> necessary ancillary data. In other words, like the folks who advocated
> phenetics in the 1960's, can machines do the grunt work currently done by
> mortals? Thanks for any constructive feedback to
[hidden email] .
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Jorge
>
>
> P.S. With apologies for potential duplicate emails.
>
>
> Jorge A. Santiago-Blay, PhD
> *
https://blaypublishers.com <
http://blaypublishers.com>*
>
> 1. Positive experiences for authors of papers published in *LEB*
>
http://blaypublishers.com/testimonials/>
> 2. Free examples of papers published in *LEB*:
>
http://blaypublishers.com/category/previous-issues/.
>
> 3. *Guidelines for Authors* and page charges of *LEB*:
>
http://blaypublishers.com/archives/ *.*
>
> 4. Want to subscribe to *LEB*?
http://blaypublishers.com/subscriptions/>
>
http://blayjorge.wordpress.com/>
>
http://paleobiology.si.edu/staff/individuals/santiagoblay.cfm>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>