Hello,
I have a collection of foreground objects (blobs) and I want to associate some of them based upon separation distance. So I create a distance matrix just like a distance table on a map for driving distances between cities. Using my threshold distance I can create an adjacency matrix. Here is an example for a 13 blob problem(best viewed with a fixed width font)... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 1 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 3 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 5 6 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 8 9 0 11 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 9 0 11 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 12 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 9 0 11 0 13 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 12 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 13 Reading across row one, blob 1 is within the threshold distance of blobs 3 and 5. You can see that blob 3 (row three) is "adjacent to 1 and 5 while blob 5 (row five) is adjacent to 1,3 and 6. And so the chase begins... It is possible to have anywhere from 1 to 13 adjacency lists where the former means they are all "connected" and the latter means they all "disconnected" or independent of each other. If I have done my figuring correctly, in the example above there are 4 connected- component lists. List1: 1,3,5,6,8,9,11,13 List2: 2,4 List3: 7 List4: 10,12 I plan to use this adjacency matrix to build adjacency lists (using a either a breadth-first-search or a depth-first-search). I plan to model the search after the Flood Filling routines described in chapter 11 of "Digital Image Processing" (Burger and Burge), but I am open to using other tricks. Before I leap into to it, I thought it worth asking here if this is already available in ImageJ. I have scoured the ImageJ website, but I think the task of searching (no pun intended) for this graph stuff is that the vocabulary of the science is so large and squishy. Thanks! Ben Tupper |
BFS is implemented in yawi3d (http://yawi3d.sourceforge.net). There
are many algorithms for graph partitioning. I think it is also worth give a try to spectral clustering. Mario -----Messaggio originale----- Da: ImageJ Interest Group [mailto:[hidden email]] Per conto di Ben Tupper Inviato: giovedì 29 aprile 2010 15.47 A: [hidden email] Oggetto: Graphs and subgraphs (connected components) Hello, I have a collection of foreground objects (blobs) and I want to associate some of them based upon separation distance. So I create a distance matrix just like a distance table on a map for driving distances between cities. Using my threshold distance I can create an adjacency matrix. Here is an example for a 13 blob problem(best viewed with a fixed width font)... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 1 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 3 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 5 6 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 8 9 0 11 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 9 0 11 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 12 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 9 0 11 0 13 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 12 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 13 Reading across row one, blob 1 is within the threshold distance of blobs 3 and 5. You can see that blob 3 (row three) is "adjacent to 1 and 5 while blob 5 (row five) is adjacent to 1,3 and 6. And so the chase begins... It is possible to have anywhere from 1 to 13 adjacency lists where the former means they are all "connected" and the latter means they all "disconnected" or independent of each other. If I have done my figuring correctly, in the example above there are 4 connected- component lists. List1: 1,3,5,6,8,9,11,13 List2: 2,4 List3: 7 List4: 10,12 I plan to use this adjacency matrix to build adjacency lists (using a either a breadth-first-search or a depth-first-search). I plan to model the search after the Flood Filling routines described in chapter 11 of "Digital Image Processing" (Burger and Burge), but I am open to using other tricks. Before I leap into to it, I thought it worth asking here if this is already available in ImageJ. I have scoured the ImageJ website, but I think the task of searching (no pun intended) for this graph stuff is that the vocabulary of the science is so large and squishy. Thanks! Ben Tupper ----- Fine del messaggio inoltrato ----- ----- Fine del messaggio inoltrato ----- |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |