Hi all,
Lately I've been working analyzing the centrosome abnormalities in some experiments. One thing we're interested in is the number of centrosomes per cell (usually two in normal cells). To detect the centrosomes we use an immunoflurescence technique where we label the centrosomes in green and counterstain the nuclei with DAPI in blue. So, we obtain images like this one: http://a.imageshack.us/img715/4948/tubulincaexample.jpg As you can see, we have some green signals (the punctual ones) distributed within the cell cytoplasm (seen as green background) but not necessarily within the nucleus. This way, a nuclear mask with the DAPI is not enough to segment the centrosomes and quantify them as a "number-of-centrosomes-per-cell" value. One approach that comes to my mind is: Segment both, centrosomes and nucleus, in their correspondent channel, and then associate the segmented centrosome signals with the nearest segmented nucleus by the minimum square distance between mass centers. So, my question is, anybody can help me with that? does anybody have done it before? Also I'll really appreciate suggestions, comments, questions, etc. Thanks! Cheers! |
Hi Ignacio
You may ant to have a look at this publication PLoS Biol. 2008 Sep 16;6(9):e224. A genome-wide RNAi screen to dissect centriole duplication and centrosome maturation in Drosophila. Dobbelaere J, Josué F, Suijkerbuijk S, Baum B, Tapon N, Raff J. http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.00602 24 The authors used Cellprofiler (http://www.cellprofiler.org/index.shtml) to score centrosomes defects. A similar protocol may work for you. Regards Bertrand -- Dr Bertrand Vernay Microscopy Senior Research Associate Developmental Biology Unit UCL Institute of Child Health 30 Guilford Street London WC1N 1EH, UK Tel : (+44) 020 7905 2224 (direct line) (+44) 020 7242 9789 (ICH switchboard) Fax: (+44) 020 7831 4366 E-mail: [hidden email] http://www.ich.ucl.ac.uk/services_and_facilities/lab_services/confocal_micro scopy_core_facility/index.html -----Original Message----- From: ImageJ Interest Group [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Ignacio Fernandez-Garcia Sent: 28 July 2010 21:48 To: [hidden email] Subject: Help: Centrosome quantification Hi all, Lately I've been working analyzing the centrosome abnormalities in some experiments. One thing we're interested in is the number of centrosomes per cell (usually two in normal cells). To detect the centrosomes we use an immunoflurescence technique where we label the centrosomes in green and counterstain the nuclei with DAPI in blue. So, we obtain images like this one: http://a.imageshack.us/img715/4948/tubulincaexample.jpg As you can see, we have some green signals (the punctual ones) distributed within the cell cytoplasm (seen as green background) but not necessarily within the nucleus. This way, a nuclear mask with the DAPI is not enough to segment the centrosomes and quantify them as a "number-of-centrosomes-per-cell" value. One approach that comes to my mind is: Segment both, centrosomes and nucleus, in their correspondent channel, and then associate the segmented centrosome signals with the nearest segmented nucleus by the minimum square distance between mass centers. So, my question is, anybody can help me with that? does anybody have done it before? Also I'll really appreciate suggestions, comments, questions, etc. Thanks! Cheers! |
In reply to this post by Ignacio Fernandez-Garcia
Hi Ignacio,
a straight forward solution, at least with your example might be: - Segment nuclei in DAPI, cut 'connected' nuclei with watershed. This will deliver errors, either acceptable or to be corrected! - Skeletonize the inverted resulting nuclei image, possibly reduced by black background (see attachment) Some cleaning delivers 'cell' areas allowing to count particles per cell area: - First measure these 'cell' areas with add to ROI Manager - Segment the particles - Update/Adjust ROIs to the intersecting particles, this will lead to ROIs per cell area of the particles macro "ROIAdjustLabel_" { // Given: A binary Image with components (selected) // roi's (ROImanager) (typically larger than the image components) // Result: rois are updated to the intersection of the roi and the binary image // Label numbers of the rois are transfered to the intersecting parts // for further analysis // setBatchMode(true); title = getTitle(); run("Select None"); run("Duplicate...", "title=tmp"); run("Select All"); run("Clear"); run("Select None"); ct=roiManager("count"); for (i=0;i<ct;i++){ roiManager("Select", i); roiManager("Fill"); imageCalculator("AND", "tmp", title); run("Make Binary"); run("Create Selection"); roiManager("Update"); run("Clear"); run("Select None"); } close(); setBatchMode(false); } Maybe this skeleton of method might help Regards Karsten Am 28.07.2010 um 22:47 schrieb Ignacio Fernandez-Garcia: > Hi all, > Lately I've been working analyzing the centrosome abnormalities in some experiments. One thing we're interested in is the number of centrosomes per cell (usually two in normal cells). To detect the centrosomes we use an immunoflurescence technique where we label the centrosomes in green and counterstain the nuclei with DAPI in blue. So, we obtain images like this one: > > http://a.imageshack.us/img715/4948/tubulincaexample.jpg > > As you can see, we have some green signals (the punctual ones) distributed within the cell cytoplasm (seen as green background) but not necessarily within the nucleus. This way, a nuclear mask with the DAPI is not enough to segment the centrosomes and quantify them as a "number-of-centrosomes-per-cell" value. > One approach that comes to my mind is: Segment both, centrosomes and nucleus, in their correspondent channel, and then associate the segmented centrosome signals with the nearest segmented nucleus by the minimum square distance between mass centers. > So, my question is, anybody can help me with that? does anybody have done it before? > Also I'll really appreciate suggestions, comments, questions, etc. > Thanks! > Cheers! [hidden email] PastedGraphic-1.png (27K) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by Ignacio Fernandez-Garcia
Hello Ignacio,
This might be a pretty dumb question, but are you sure you need to associate each centrosome with a nucleus? If you are just interested in the number of centrosomes per cell, why not segment both, count the total number of nuclei per image, count the total number of centrosomes per image, and determine the ratio? Of course it would not give you an exact value, but if you simply want to show statistical differences between conditions, it might be all you need to do. If you are worried about counting cells that are on the image borders and whose centrosomes might not be included in the image, there are ways to set filters in the "analyze particles" function to avoid counting nuclei that are only partially visible. I think your error rate would be fairly low and you would get a very good estimate of the number of centrosomes per cell. Maybe worth testing... Best regards, Elizabeth Ignacio Fernandez-Garcia a écrit : > Hi all, > Lately I've been working analyzing the centrosome abnormalities in some experiments. One thing we're interested in is the number of centrosomes per cell (usually two in normal cells). To detect the centrosomes we use an immunoflurescence technique where we label the centrosomes in green and counterstain the nuclei with DAPI in blue. So, we obtain images like this one: > > http://a.imageshack.us/img715/4948/tubulincaexample.jpg > > As you can see, we have some green signals (the punctual ones) distributed within the cell cytoplasm (seen as green background) but not necessarily within the nucleus. This way, a nuclear mask with the DAPI is not enough to segment the centrosomes and quantify them as a "number-of-centrosomes-per-cell" value. > One approach that comes to my mind is: Segment both, centrosomes and nucleus, in their correspondent channel, and then associate the segmented centrosome signals with the nearest segmented nucleus by the minimum square distance between mass centers. > So, my question is, anybody can help me with that? does anybody have done it before? > Also I'll really appreciate suggestions, comments, questions, etc. > Thanks! > Cheers! > -- Elizabeth CROWELL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Membrane Traffic and Cell Division Research Group Institut Pasteur 28 rue du Dr Roux 75015 PARIS, France Tel : 01.44.38.94.07 Fax : 01.45.68.89.54 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
In reply to this post by Bertrand Vernay
Hi again,
Thank you so much for all this help! I'm going to try both approaches, the CellProfiler and the skeletonize one. The ratio suggestion is also a good one that I'll keep in mind in case the cell-by-cell quantification doesn't work. Best, -- Ignacio Fernandez-Garcia, PhD Radiation Oncology NYU Medical Center |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |