Anyone have comments on ImageJS?
See: http://www.kurzweilai.net/web-apps-for-bioinformatics?utm_source=KurzweilAI+Weekly+Newsletter&utm_campaign=b60382892c-UA-946742-1&utm_medium=email and: Jonas S Almeida, Egiebade E Iriabho, Vijaya L Gorrepati, Sean R Wilkinson, Alexander Grüneberg, David E Robbins, James R Hackney, ImageJS: Personalized, participated, pervasive, and reproducible image bioinformatics in the web browser, Journal of Pathology Informatics, 2012, DOI: 10.4103/2153-3539.98813 (open access) -- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter. SPAMfighter has removed 235 of my spam emails to date. Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len Do you have a slow PC? Try Free scan http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Hi Blackledge,
> Anyone have comments on ImageJS? It is exciting to think about an ImageJ that could work with large multidimensional data remotely from the web browser. But ImageJS in its current incarnation looks like a toy to me. From the prototype (http://imagejs.github.com), it hardly appears to do anything. I think it is awfully early to be publicizing the tool: there have only been 58 commits to master so far, and there is a grand total of 915 lines of JS code. The development doesn't appear to be very active, either (see https://github.com/imagejs/imagejs.github.com/commits/master). Lastly, it seems very misleading to claim that it is "like ImageJ, but in JavaScript" since I don't really see any similarities to ImageJ. What I would like to see is an effort to harness the ImageJ2 infrastructure from Javascript. With ImageJ2 we are trying to isolate parts of the codebase that could be reused in a web browser. A Javascript layer would still need to be created, but it could communicate with a server-side Java application that embeds ImageJ2, using technologies such as Hessian, Apache Thrift or ZeroC Ice. Tools like OMERO (http://openmicroscopy.org/) are the way to go here. Ultimately we are striving to provide a proper separation of concerns that makes possible even an Android app, or code powered by the Google Web Toolkit. Regards, Curtis On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Blackledge <[hidden email]> wrote: > Anyone have comments on ImageJS? > > See: > http://www.kurzweilai.net/web-apps-for-bioinformatics?utm_source=KurzweilAI+Weekly+Newsletter&utm_campaign=b60382892c-UA-946742-1&utm_medium=email > > and: Jonas S Almeida, Egiebade E Iriabho, Vijaya L Gorrepati, Sean R > Wilkinson, Alexander Grüneberg, David E Robbins, James R Hackney, ImageJS: > Personalized, participated, pervasive, and reproducible image > bioinformatics in the web browser, Journal of Pathology Informatics, 2012, > DOI: 10.4103/2153-3539.98813 (open access) > > -- > I am using the free version of SPAMfighter. > SPAMfighter has removed 235 of my spam emails to date. > Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len > > Do you have a slow PC? Try Free scan > http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen > > -- > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
In reply to this post by Blackledge
Hi All,
If there are plans for web integration of IJ2 the first thing that we have to do is to implement XMLHttp object (unfortunately native for Mozilla and M$). Before doing that there is hardly any place for using JavaScript to its full potential. Best regards, Dimiter -----Original Message----- From: Curtis Rueden [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Tuesday 31 July 2012 20:59 Subject: Re: Image JS Hi Blackledge, > Anyone have comments on ImageJS? It is exciting to think about an ImageJ that could work with large multidimensional data remotely from the web browser. But ImageJS in its current incarnation looks like a toy to me. From the prototype (http://imagejs.github.com), it hardly appears to do anything. I think it is awfully early to be publicizing the tool: there have only been 58 commits to master so far, and there is a grand total of 915 lines of JS code. The development doesn't appear to be very active, either (see https://github.com/imagejs/imagejs.github.com/commits/master). Lastly, it seems very misleading to claim that it is "like ImageJ, but in JavaScript" since I don't really see any similarities to ImageJ. What I would like to see is an effort to harness the ImageJ2 infrastructure from Javascript. With ImageJ2 we are trying to isolate parts of the codebase that could be reused in a web browser. A Javascript layer would still need to be created, but it could communicate with a server-side Java application that embeds ImageJ2, using technologies such as Hessian, Apache Thrift or ZeroC Ice. Tools like OMERO (http://openmicroscopy.org/) are the way to go here. Ultimately we are striving to provide a proper separation of concerns that makes possible even an Android app, or code powered by the Google Web Toolkit. Regards, Curtis On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Blackledge <[hidden email]> wrote: > Anyone have comments on ImageJS? > > See: > http://www.kurzweilai.net/web-apps-for-bioinformatics?utm_source=Kurzw > eilAI+Weekly+Newsletter&utm_campaign=b60382892c-UA-946742-1&utm_medium > > and: Jonas S Almeida, Egiebade E Iriabho, Vijaya L Gorrepati, Sean R > Wilkinson, Alexander Grüneberg, David E Robbins, James R Hackney, ImageJS: > Personalized, participated, pervasive, and reproducible image > bioinformatics in the web browser, Journal of Pathology Informatics, > 2012, > DOI: 10.4103/2153-3539.98813 (open access) > > -- > I am using the free version of SPAMfighter. > SPAMfighter has removed 235 of my spam emails to date. > Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len > > Do you have a slow PC? Try Free scan > http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen > > -- > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |