Auto update on Mac OS 10.4 is telling me to install "Java 2 Platform,
Standard Edition (J2SE) 5.0 Release 3" Is this a good idea for ImageJ 1.34s ? --- Michael J. Herron, U of MN, Dept. of Entomology [hidden email] |
The default behavior of the update is to leave the current version of
Java as the default version and to make the 5.0 version available as an alternative. So, unless you specifically select the 5.0 version as the new default (via an application in /applications/utility/java) it will not make a difference. The update automatically detects applets and applications which do use the new 5.0 API and transparently switches to the 5.0 JVM/API for those applets/applications. ImageJ does not make use of the 5.0 API - though it should work fine, and possibly more efficiently with the new JVM. If you are feeling adventurous you could enable it via the above mentioned app, try it out, and if it doesn't work switch back. --- Dr. Mark Burge http://imagingbook.com/ On 11/16/05, Michael J. Herron <[hidden email]> wrote: > Auto update on Mac OS 10.4 is telling me to install "Java 2 Platform, > Standard Edition (J2SE) 5.0 Release 3" > Is this a good idea for ImageJ 1.34s ? > > --- > > Michael J. Herron, U of MN, Dept. of Entomology > [hidden email] > |
I have been using 5.0 since the first developer preview release
because some of my plugins use 5.0 code (generics and such) and i never had a problem. kurt On 16 Nov 2005, at 14:11, Mark Burge wrote: > The default behavior of the update is to leave the current version of > Java as the default version and to make the 5.0 version available as > an alternative. So, unless you specifically select the 5.0 version as > the new default (via an application in /applications/utility/java) it > will not make a difference. The update automatically detects applets > and applications which do use the new 5.0 API and transparently > switches to the 5.0 JVM/API for those applets/applications. ImageJ > does not make use of the 5.0 API - though it should work fine, and > possibly more efficiently with the new JVM. If you are feeling > adventurous you could enable it via the above mentioned app, try it > out, and if it doesn't work switch back. > > --- > Dr. Mark Burge > http://imagingbook.com/ > > On 11/16/05, Michael J. Herron <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Auto update on Mac OS 10.4 is telling me to install "Java 2 Platform, >> Standard Edition (J2SE) 5.0 Release 3" >> Is this a good idea for ImageJ 1.34s ? >> >> --- >> >> Michael J. Herron, U of MN, Dept. of Entomology >> [hidden email] >> *--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--* University of Sheffield Academic Neurology Unit Division of Genomic Medicine E Floor, Medical School Beech Hill Road Sheffield S10 2RX United Kingdom Tel: ++44 (0) 114 271 2473 Fax: ++44 (0) 114 226 1201 Email: [hidden email] *--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--* |
Java 5.0 on Mac OS X 10.4 has an annoying and frustrating bug than
sometimes causes ImageJ to ignore keyboard shortcuts. More information about this bug is available at "http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/docs/install/osx.html#bugs". It's item 8 on the "Known Problems" list. -wayne On 16 Nov 2005, at 14:11, Mark Burge wrote: > The default behavior of the update is to leave the current version of > Java as the default version and to make the 5.0 version available as > an alternative. So, unless you specifically select the 5.0 version as > the new default (via an application in /applications/utility/java) it > will not make a difference. The update automatically detects applets > and applications which do use the new 5.0 API and transparently > switches to the 5.0 JVM/API for those applets/applications. ImageJ > does not make use of the 5.0 API - though it should work fine, and > possibly more efficiently with the new JVM. If you are feeling > adventurous you could enable it via the above mentioned app, try it > out, and if it doesn't work switch back. > > > On 11/16/05, Michael J. Herron <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Auto update on Mac OS 10.4 is telling me to install "Java 2 Platform, >> Standard Edition (J2SE) 5.0 Release 3" >> Is this a good idea for ImageJ 1.34s ? |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |