Not sure where this thread is since I get digests, but a comment on
comparing images: The Paste Control option allows you to copy an image, then paste it (onto another image or back on top of itself) to view a combination of two images where the combination is calculated in real time as you shift the pasted image around. A little experimentation would allow you to cut the image, draw the desired line, then paste the image back on top to accomplish your goal of moving an image around relative to the fixed line. I suspect a white or black line would be best, then use the "Brightest" or "Darkest" option under Paste Control to keep the line visible at all times. Adding the real-time profile seems a bit tougher... I will guess that Paste Control is one of the coolest "Wow" factors when demonstrating ImageJ to new users. It also has a lot of real utility when trying to compare differences between images. My $0.02 Bill William A. Heeschen, Ph.D. Microscopy, Digital Imaging The Dow Chemical Company Midland, MI 48674 [hidden email] Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:56:41 -0400 From: "Barton, Robert" <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: creating a fixed line segment and movable image Eventually, I'd like to be able to compare two images to each other = using an x- and a y- profile. I figure it will be easiest to = incorporate two fixed line segments along with fixing one image. That = would allow me to have a constant x- and y- profile of the fixed image = and I could move the other image and observe it's real-time profile to = align it with the fixed image. =20 I guess at this point I'm just trying to take one small step towards a = much larger solution. |
Thanks Bill, I think you're pointing me in the direction I was looking for. Maybe you could help me out a little more with the Paste function. I've tried just a right-click Copy, Paste of an image onto itself as well as onto another image, but in both cases, the pasted image just overlays the original image. You mentioned that I should be able to view a combination that is calculated realtime, so I was excepting the overlaid pixels to sum together. Am I missing a trivial step along the way?
Thanks again for the help, Robert ________________________________ From: ImageJ Interest Group on behalf of Heeschen, Bill (WA) Sent: Tue 7/17/2007 8:50 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: IMAGEJ Digest - creating a fixed line segment and movable im age Not sure where this thread is since I get digests, but a comment on comparing images: The Paste Control option allows you to copy an image, then paste it (onto another image or back on top of itself) to view a combination of two images where the combination is calculated in real time as you shift the pasted image around. A little experimentation would allow you to cut the image, draw the desired line, then paste the image back on top to accomplish your goal of moving an image around relative to the fixed line. I suspect a white or black line would be best, then use the "Brightest" or "Darkest" option under Paste Control to keep the line visible at all times. Adding the real-time profile seems a bit tougher... I will guess that Paste Control is one of the coolest "Wow" factors when demonstrating ImageJ to new users. It also has a lot of real utility when trying to compare differences between images. My $0.02 Bill William A. Heeschen, Ph.D. Microscopy, Digital Imaging The Dow Chemical Company Midland, MI 48674 [hidden email] Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:56:41 -0400 From: "Barton, Robert" <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: creating a fixed line segment and movable image Eventually, I'd like to be able to compare two images to each other = using an x- and a y- profile. I figure it will be easiest to = incorporate two fixed line segments along with fixing one image. That = would allow me to have a constant x- and y- profile of the fixed image = and I could move the other image and observe it's real-time profile to = align it with the fixed image. =20 I guess at this point I'm just trying to take one small step towards a = much larger solution. |
In reply to this post by Heeschen, Bill (WA)
Sure enough, as soon as I confirm my last email, I stopped right-clicking and noticed the Paste Controls... option under the Edit menu. That truely is a "Wow!" factor!
Thanks again! ________________________________ From: ImageJ Interest Group on behalf of Heeschen, Bill (WA) Sent: Tue 7/17/2007 8:50 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: IMAGEJ Digest - creating a fixed line segment and movable im age Not sure where this thread is since I get digests, but a comment on comparing images: The Paste Control option allows you to copy an image, then paste it (onto another image or back on top of itself) to view a combination of two images where the combination is calculated in real time as you shift the pasted image around. A little experimentation would allow you to cut the image, draw the desired line, then paste the image back on top to accomplish your goal of moving an image around relative to the fixed line. I suspect a white or black line would be best, then use the "Brightest" or "Darkest" option under Paste Control to keep the line visible at all times. Adding the real-time profile seems a bit tougher... I will guess that Paste Control is one of the coolest "Wow" factors when demonstrating ImageJ to new users. It also has a lot of real utility when trying to compare differences between images. My $0.02 Bill William A. Heeschen, Ph.D. Microscopy, Digital Imaging The Dow Chemical Company Midland, MI 48674 [hidden email] Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:56:41 -0400 From: "Barton, Robert" <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: creating a fixed line segment and movable image Eventually, I'd like to be able to compare two images to each other = using an x- and a y- profile. I figure it will be easiest to = incorporate two fixed line segments along with fixing one image. That = would allow me to have a constant x- and y- profile of the fixed image = and I could move the other image and observe it's real-time profile to = align it with the fixed image. =20 I guess at this point I'm just trying to take one small step towards a = much larger solution. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |