Haha.
I feel like this is the big issue in using the Gaussian blur, threshold, watershed, particle analysis pipeline. I frankly do not know how people have been getting away with using this method since it seems to produce horrible results in real life conditions (uneven light distribution, cell touching, background noise, etc.). I myself am particularly frustrated because I was hired to improve the results of the implemented pipeline (I get the impression the professor and graduate student that I am working with think this should be easy). What would you do if you were in my situation?
ANYWAY, I am working on improving the pipeline to produce more accurate results, but, until then, you might want to try the method that I found described in this paper (2009):
http://genome.cshlp.org/content/19/11/2113.fullThe paper claims accuracies into the 98 percentile, although I am skeptical and haven't been able to test the method out myself yet.