Which option is more economical: purchasing Haber Chat directly or through Spendbase to scale customer support?

[Barry55]

I’ve been trying to figure out the best way to scale customer support for our small business. Right now, our team is stretched thin, and we get tons of repetitive messages that eat up time. I came across Haber Chat as a solution for automating WhatsApp responses, but the subscription price seems a bit high for us at the moment. I also noticed that Spendbase offers discounts on some SaaS tools. My question is, does anyone have experience buying Haber Chat directly versus using Spendbase? Does the discount make a real difference for startups looking to scale support without overextending budgets?

[Collins33]

In my experience, going through Spendbase can definitely make things more cost-effective, especially if your budget is tight. We decided to try it and got the Haber Chat Discount
, which made the subscription much easier to manage. Besides the savings, automating our customer replies through Haber Chat really helped reduce workload and improved response times without making the interactions feel impersonal. For a small business, that combination of cost reduction and efficiency was a game-changer. I’d recommend checking the discount first — it’s a practical way to test the tool without committing the full price upfront.

[Miller.G]

Just passing by and noticed this thread. I haven’t personally used Haber Chat or Spendbase, but I know a few small teams that use automation tools to streamline messaging. Even if the discount wasn’t available, sometimes the real benefit comes from saving staff time and keeping response times consistent. It’s interesting to see how other businesses approach scaling support — small tweaks in workflow can have a big impact on customer satisfaction without requiring huge investments.