Hi all!
Thank you Sofia for bringing this up, i wish someone here picks the glove
to give a good answer for this one, i have some points to add.
Western is a rather crude method on my humble opinion differences of less
then 20% are undetectable - basically if you can't see it and you have to
make a quantification it's not there.
When scanning one has to make sure the blot is not overexposed, i've
noticed that the best exposure to scan is one before the one which looks
best to the eye, digital cameras can show overexposure (is it any good?).
I think that in the case Sofia describes if the above the band the
background is white and below it's still dark one can draw an inclined line
at the bottom of the peak to account for the background.
And last i think that once upon a time people used to quantify gels with
photoshop - measuring the area of the band and average intensity how does
that relate to the peak (width is area height intensity).
Hanna
--
ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html