Dear ImageJ users,
I plan to use ImageJ for particle size analysis and for particle tracking of irregular shaped particles. In order to test my system I have taken an image of a fixed frequency grid distortion target. The grid distortion target is made up of 62.5 microns diameter dots at 125 microns spacing. The grid has dots in both directions. The image after thresholding shows that distortion is occurring (the dots appear larger with distance from the center of the image). Could anyone please help me with either some advice on how this distortion can be accounted for, or even better provide me with some code which would correct this distortion. The plan is to apply the distortion correction to subsequent images of irregular shaped particles, from which size and other information can be obtained. Thanks in advance Iain MacDonald |
Macdonald Iain Mr (ENV) wrote:
> The image after thresholding shows that distortion is occurring (the > dots appear larger with distance from the center of the image). Could > anyone please help me with either some advice on how this distortion can > be accounted for, or even better provide me with some code which would > correct this distortion. > > The plan is to apply the distortion correction to subsequent images of > irregular shaped particles, from which size and other information can be > obtained. > > You can do this with the lens distortion correction plugin, but I am not sure of how. The plugin is intended for correcting lens distortions as computed out of several heavily overlapping images. Please see the documentation: http://pacific.mpi-cbg.de/wiki/index.php/Distortion_correction http://www.kaynig.de/downloads/DistortionCorrectionPlugin_Manual.pdf Albert -- Albert Cardona http://albert.rierol.net |
In reply to this post by Macdonald Iain Mr (ENV)
Dear Ian,
if the distortion is caused by an optical lens, you may try the following approach: http://www.erik-krause.de/index.htm?./verzeichnung/distort_en.htm that uses the PanoTools http://panotools.sourceforge.net/ for estimating the lens-distortion model and rendering the corrected image. It is not required to mark "lines", (manually marked) point correspondences in the distorted and a (manually created?) undistorted reference image will do fine. For microscopy images, choose a very low FOV and fix it. Alternatively to PTGui, use hugin http://hugin.sourceforge.net/ If the distortion is not caused by an optical lens (not rotationally symmetric) and your are too lazy to think about the distortion model, you can give bUnwarpJ http://biocomp.cnb.uam.es/~iarganda/bUnwarpJ/ a try. If you lack an undistorted image, create it manually. If the program fails distorting these images based on the image intensities, you can select the corresponding dots manually and set the landmark weight to 1.0. Make sure to constrain the distortion everywhere in the image either by landmark-correspondences or corresponding image content. Best regards, Stephan On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 16:19 +0100, Macdonald Iain Mr (ENV) wrote: > Dear ImageJ users, > > > > I plan to use ImageJ for particle size analysis and for particle > tracking of irregular shaped particles. In order to test my system I > have taken an image of a fixed frequency grid distortion target. The > grid distortion target is made up of 62.5 microns diameter dots at > 125 > microns spacing. The grid has dots in both directions. > > > > The image after thresholding shows that distortion is occurring (the > dots appear larger with distance from the center of the image). Could > anyone please help me with either some advice on how this distortion > can > be accounted for, or even better provide me with some code which would > correct this distortion. > > > > The plan is to apply the distortion correction to subsequent images of > irregular shaped particles, from which size and other information can > be > obtained. > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > Iain MacDonald > > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |